ENVIRONMENT/Geographical information system

 

ENVIRONNEMENT / SYSTEME D’INFORMATION GEOGRAPHIQUE

 

 

REFLECTIONS ON ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE AND SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE

IN AREAS OF AUTONOMOUS TRYPANOSOMOSIS CONTROL

 

QUELQUES REMARQUES SUR LE CHANGEMENT DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT ET L’AGRICULTURE DURABLE DANS DES ZONES DE CONTROLE AUTONOME DE LA TRYPANOSOMOSE

 

David Bourn

 

Environmental Research Group Oxford Limited P.O. Box 346, Oxford, OX1 3QE, UK

Website: http://ergodd.zoo.ox.ac.uk E-mail: david.bourn@ntlworld.com

 

Résumé

De graves dégradations de l’environnement dues en partie aux activités agricoles continuent d’affecter toute l’Afrique.

 

Beaucoup de pays n’ont ni les moyens ni la volonté d’intégrer les impératifs écologiques dans leurs politiques de développement agricole et rural.

 

Cela s’explique notamment par le fait que les débats relatifs à l’agriculture durable à l’échelle internationale ont été axés sur les problèmes écologiques sans véritable participation des Ministères de l’Agriculture.

 

L’agriculture est généralement considérée comme étant la source du problème, sans tenir compte du fait que de bonnes pratiques agricoles figurent aussi parmi les solutions.

 

Cette communication met en exergue les principaux acteurs du changement de l’environnement dans les zones infestées par les tsétsé en Afrique et identifie les principaux facteurs de promotion de l’agriculture durable.

 

Summary

Serious environmental degradation, caused at least in part by agricultural activities, continues apace throughout Africa.

 

Many countries appear unable, or unwilling, to integrate environmental considerations into their agricultural and rural development policies.

 

One reason for this is that the international debate on sustainable agriculture has concentrated on environmental issues, with which many ministries of agriculture are not fully engaged.

 

Agriculture is often presented as a significant part of the problem, with little regard for good agricultural practices that are part of the solution.

 

This paper highlights the main drivers of environmental change in tsetse-controlled areas of Africa and identifies key factors in the promotion of sustainable agriculture.

 

Introduction

Two years ago at the previous ISCTRC meeting in Ouagadougou, I presented a paper on human impacts on the environment and the autonomous control of tsetse and trypanosomosis in Sub-Saharan Africa, and discussed some of the implications for sustainable, farmer-focused disease control (Bourn, 2001; Bourn et al., 2001). Today, I wish to extend that line of enquiry/train of thought and present some reflections on environmental change and sustainable agriculture and rural development in areas of autonomous trypanosomosis control.

 

Last year, I was fortunate enough to return to western Ethiopia, 25 years after my first field studies there in 1976/77 (Bourn and Scott, 1978), to work with the national component of the East African regional programme to promote Farming in Tsetse Controlled Areas (FITCA).

 

The FITCA programme includes Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda, and potentially Burundi and Rwanda, and is supported by the European Union. FITCA is meant to involve rural communities, civil servants, the public and private veterinary services, public health, and research institutions, and support tsetse and trypanosomosis control, training in livestock nutrition and management practices, management of disease constraints and better land-use practices (http://www.delken.cec.eu.int/en/eu_and_kenya/cooperation/farming_in_tsetse_controlled_areas.htm).

 

This presentation is based on my work with FITCA-Ethiopia (Bourn, 2002) and that of two colleagues: Bruce King, remote sensing and land use planning specialist (King, 2002); and Chris Rhodes, forestry resource and community management specialist (Rhodes, 2002). But first a few generalities about environmental change and the concept of sustainable agriculture and rural development.

 

Environmental Change

All natural ecosystems and environments are dynamic entities, varying from day to night, from day to day, from month to month, from season to season, from year to year, and over much longer periods, driven by global, lunar and solar cycles, and various atmospheric, oceanic and geological processes (Goudie, 2001).

 

In addition to these natural phenomena, human activities also have many profound impacts on the environment, which maybe of local, national, regional or global significance, relating to changes in plants, animals, soils, water, landscapes and the atmosphere. Examples include: the use of fire to clear land and for hunting; the construction of roads to improve access and facilitate the movement of people, produce and trade; agricultural expansion, deforestation and loss of biodiversity; urbanisation, industrialisation and pollution; green house gas emissions leading to global warming, climate change and rising sea levels.

 

It is important to understand the causes and consequences of environmental change, so that appropriate strategies can be devised and implemented to promote sustainable practices and discourage harmful ones. This is especially so with the expansion of farming, natural resource management and the promotion of sustainable agriculture and rural development.

 

Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development

The concept of Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development (SARD) encompasses a broad range of human activities, economic sectors and administrative responsibilities, and is inherently interdisciplinary in nature, involving not just agriculture, but also education, energy, health, water, natural resource management and conservation. Agriculture and rural development are deemed to be sustainable when they are “ecologically sound, economically viable, socially just, culturally appropriate, humane and based on a holistic scientific approach” (http://www.fao.org/wssd/-SARD/SARD1_en.htm).

 

Volume one of the FAO trainer’s manual on "Sustainability issues in agricultural and rural development policies" (FAO, 1995) defines SARD as a process that:

·         Ensures that the basic nutritional requirements of present and future generations are met, both qualitatively and quantitatively, whilst at the same time providing a variety of other agricultural products;

·         Provides durable employment, sufficient income, and decent living and working conditions for all those engaged in agricultural production;

·         Maintains and, where possible, enhances the productive capacity of the natural resource base as a whole, and the regenerative capacity of renewable resources, without disrupting the functioning of basic ecological cycles and natural balances, destroying the socio-cultural attributes of rural communities, or contaminating the environment;

·         Reduces the vulnerability of the agricultural sector to adverse natural and socio-economic factors and other risks, and strengthens self-reliance.

 

In short, SARD is a complex, long-term process, involving many players at all levels of society from farmer to politician.

 

Environmental Change in South-western Ethiopia

The main drivers of environmental change in south-western Ethiopia are human population growth, resettlement, migration and agricultural expansion.

 

Human Population Growth and Distribution

When Ethiopia’s last official census was held in 1994, the human population was 53.5 million. Since then, the population has been increasing at between 3.2% and 2.7% per annum and reached 65.6 million in 2000. On median projections, the population will rise to 84 million in 2010; 116 million in 2025; and 171million in 2050 (Figure 1a).

Most Ethiopians live in the highlands, where the climate is cooler and rainfall is greater. With population growth, there is keen competition for land resources, and agricultural settlement has been expanding for many decades, both in the highlands, where land suitable for farming is still available, but increasingly into peripheral slopes and lowlands (Figure 1b).

 

Figure 1: Human Population Growth and Distribution

 

a) Growth

b) Distribution

Sources: United Nations (2003) and FAO et al. (2001)

 

Resettlement and Migration

There has been a very substantial movement and redistribution of people in Ethiopia over the past few decades, arising from a combination of factors relating to recurrent droughts and famines, and both government organised and spontaneous resettlement. Voluntary resettlement, or migration to less densely populated areas with agricultural potential continues apace today and is a cause of mounting social and political discontent.

Resettlement

During the late seventies and early eighties, some 320,000 families from drought-stricken regions in northern Ethiopia were relocated on government settlement schemes in the lowlands of south-western Ethiopia, as indicated Figure 2. With an average family size of five, this is equivalent to the movement of some 1.6 million people, more than two-thirds of whom were settled in areas deemed to have a high trypanosomosis risk.

 

Figure 2: Resettlement in Areas of Trypanosomosis Risk

Source: MOA (1984).

 

Migration

The scale and extent of population movement and redistribution of people during the seventies and eighties is reflected in the 1994 census, in which some 7 million people or 14.1% of the population, excluding nomadic Afars and Somalis, were classified as migrants. For people in rural areas, migrants were defined as those who had come from any urban area, or who had moved from a rural area in another wereda. For people in urban areas, migrants were defined as those who came from any rural area, or who had come from any other town.

Oromiya, Amhara, Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples (SNNP) and Addis Ababa, had the largest numbers of migrants as shown in Figure 3.

 

Figure 3: Number of Migrants in Regional States – 1994 Census

Source: CSA (1998).

 

Agricultural Expansion

Land Use Change in the Upper Dhidessa Catchment

King (2002) examined changes in land cover/land use in the Upper Dhidessa catchment over the past three decades, comparing 1973 aerial photography with 2001 LANDSAT imagery. Six east-west strip transects of aerial photographs provided coverage of highlands, valley slopes and the valley floor: one strip was five kilometres north of Bedele town; one was at the same latitude of Bedele town; one was at the latitude of Gechi town; and the other three were centred on northings: 906000, 895500 and 892000. Northern, central and southern portions of each strip of aerial photographs was sampled at one-kilometre intervals to provide a total of 531 sample points for comparative land cover assessment. Land cover changes in the Upper Dhidessa valley between 1973 and 2001 are summarised Table and

Figure 4.

 

Table1: Upper Dhidessa Land Cover Change Matrix: 1973-2001

 

 

1973 – Percentage Cover

 

2001

Forest

River Forest

Woodland

Scrubland

Grassland

Marsh

River

Cultivation

Total in 2001

Forest

21.1

 

0.4

 

 

 

 

2.4

23.9

River Forest

 

7.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.7

Woodland

 

 

10.5

 

 

 

 

0.6

11.1

Scrubland

1.1

0.2

 

2.8

0.6

 

 

3.0

7.7

Grassland

 

 

 

0.2

11.5

 

 

0.6

12.2

Marsh

 

 

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

0.8

River

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

0.4

 

0.6

Cultivation

4.3

 

4.7

0.6

0.6

 

 

25.8

36.0

Total in 1973

26.6

7.9

15.6

3.6

12.8

0.8

0.4

32.4

100.0

Source: Derived from King (2002).

 

Cultivation increased by 11.1%, from 32.4% of the land area in 1973 to 36.0% in 2001, largely at the expense of woodland and forest, with a significantly higher proportion of woodland (30%) being converted to cultivation than forest (16.2%). The increase in shrubland from 3.6% to 7.7% is indicative of an expansion of fallow land.

 

Figure 4: Land Cover Change in the Upper Dhidessa Catchment 1973-2001

Montane forest cover, excluding riverine forest, declined by 20.3%, from 26.6% in 1973 to 21.1% in 2001. This reduction in natural forest cover was offset to some extent by the establishment of new forest plantations mainly of exotic pines (indicated in the table by change from cultivation and woodland to forest), resulting in a net overall forest loss of 10.2%. Coffee is a major cash crop in the region and much of the montane forest is under-planted with coffee bushes, which require shade. Visual comparison of the aerial photography and satellite imagery indicated that many small patches of forest had disappeared, while larger plantations have been created.

 

Figure 2